M3 A5 DB: CASE STUDY IDENTIFYING ETHICAL CONCERNS

M3 A5 DB: CASE STUDY IDENTIFYING ETHICAL CONCERNS

• If this item does not open automatically you can open M3 A5 DB: CASE STUDY IDENTIFYING ETHICAL CONCERNS here

Overview

In this discussion board, you will read the “Bad Blood” Case Study provided in instructional materials. After completing the reading. Give some thought to the following questions and post your response in the DB:

• Why do you believe the participants took part in this study?
• What ethical principles were violated in this research study?
• Would an experiment such as this be conducted today? Why or why not?

Your initial post must be posted before you can view and respond to colleagues, must contain minimum of two (2) references, in addition to examples from your personal experiences to augment the topic. The goal is to make your post interesting and engaging so others will want to read/respond to it. Synthesize and summarize from your resources in order to avoid the use of direct quotes, which can often be dry and boring. No direct quotes are allowed in the discussion board posts.

Post a thoughtful response to at least two (2) other colleagues’ initial postings. Responses to colleagues should be supportive and helpful (examples of an acceptable comment are: “This is interesting – in my practice, we treated or resolved (diagnosis or issue) with (x, y, z meds, theory, management principle) and according to the literature…” and add supportive reference. Avoid comments such as “I agree” or “good comment.”

| GET AN EXPERT FOR YOUR ASSIGNMENT /

Objectives

• Identify unethical practices in the conduct of research
• Describe how reasoning for participation may be influenced by incentives
• Discuss measures that are currently in place to prevent unethical research

Points: 30

Due Dates:

• Initial Post: Fri, Feb 5 by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Standard Time (EST) of the US.
• Response Post: Sun, Feb 7 by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Standard Time (EST) of the US – (the response posts cannot be done on the same day as the initial post).

References:

• Initial Post: Minimum of two (2) total references: one (1) from required course materials and one (1) from peer-reviewed references.
• Response posts: Minimum of one (1) total reference: one (1) from peer-reviewed or course materials reference per response.

Words Limits

• Initial Post: Minimum 200 words excluding references (approximately one (1) page)
• Response posts: Minimum 100 words excluding references.

Note: Since it is difficult to edit the APA reference in the Blackboard discussion area, you can copy and paste APA references from your Word document to the Blackboard discussion area.  Points will not be deducted because of format changes in spacing.

| GET AN EXPERT FOR YOUR ASSIGNMENT /

Instructions

To be successful, complete the following steps in order:

STEP 1. Review the instructional materials and finish learning activities for this module.

STEP 2. Click here to download the rubric. 

STEP 3. Create a new Word document, type your initial post.

STEP 4. Copy the initial post from the Word document.

STEP 5. Click on “DISCUSSIONS” section located on the left-hand side of your screen in Blackboard.

STEP 6. Post in the discussion forum titled “M3 A5 DB: CASE STUDY IDENTIFYING ETHICAL CONCERNS”

SAMPLE SOLUTION

Ethics plays an important role in research as it helps in advocating for truth, advancing knowledge and ensuring that there is respect for subjects in the research. One of the key ethical principles when dealing with human participants is beneficence which advocates for doing good and preventing| GET AN EXPERT FOR YOUR ASSIGNMENT / an ethical norm that human participants be required to consent to any research process. However, such ethical principles are often disregarded as is the case in Tuskegee Syphilis research project which will be discussed in this task.
Why the Participants took | GET AN EXPERT FOR YOUR ASSIGNMENT / reasons as to why the participants took part in the study. One such reason is that the participants, most of them African Americans believes they had bad blood and the test would help them be like other privileged people. Secondly, most of the participants were poor and hence hoped that the program was an avenue for them…