HOMEWORK GUIDE | In the Week One Assignment, you formulated a concrete ethical question, took a position on that topic, and identified a reason supporting and a reason opposing that position.

Please use week 1 and week 3 papers towards week 5. Also use the list of acceptable primary resources.

Overview
In the Week One Assignment, you formulated a concrete ethical question, took a position on that topic, and identified a reason supporting and a reason opposing that position. In the Week Three Assignment, you discussed either deontological or utilitarian theory, applied that theory to the question, and raised a relevant objection.

| PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW AT writtask.com |

By engaging with the course material, you now have had a chance to refine your thinking and broaden your understanding of the problem by approaching it from the perspective of multiple ethical theories.

In this paper, you will demonstrate what you have learned by writing an essay in which you

• Present a revised formulation of the ethical question and introduction to the topic.
• Explain the kind of reasoning you think is the best way to approach this question, and how that reasoning supports the position you think is strongest.
• Raise an objection and be able to respond to it.

Instructions

| PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW AT writtask.com |

Write an essay that conforms to the requirements below. The paper must be 1500 to 2000 words in length (excluding the title and reference pages) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..

The paragraphs of your essay should conform to the following guidelines:

• Introduction
  
  

Your first paragraph should begin with the topic question, suitably revised. It should be focused, concrete, and on a relevant moral problem. You should then introduce the topic in the way described by the Week One instructions, but reflecting the developed understanding and information you have gained about the topic and any necessary refinement of the scope.

| PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW AT writtask.com |

Follow this with a thesis statement that states your position, and a brief description of the primary reason(s) supporting your position. (See the handout on thesis statements provided). Finally, provide a brief preview of the overall aim and procedure of your paper.

• Explanation and Demonstration of Moral Reasoning

This section of the Final Paper will explain and demonstrate what you believe to be the best way of reasoning about the question you have chosen and showing how that reasoning supports the position you have taken on the question. You might explain the principles, rules, values, virtues, conceptions of purposes and ends, and other general ideas that you find persuasive, and show how they support concrete judgments.

In the course of doing so, you must make reference to at least two of the approaches that we have examined in the course (such as deontological, utilitarian, or virtue-based), and utilize at least one resource off the provided list for each of the two approaches. One of these theories may be the theory you discussed in your

Week Three Assignment, but your discussion here should be more refined.

For example, you might find the reasoning associated with Aristotelian virtue ethics to be the most compelling, and reference Aristotle in the process of showing how that reasoning supports a certain conclusion. In the course of this, you could contrast that with a utilitarian approach, referencing Mill for instance.

• Objection and Response

After explaining the ethical reasoning that supports your position, you should raise an objection and respond to it. An objection articulates a plausible reason why someone might find the argument weak or problematic. You should explain how it brings out this weakness and do so in a way that would be acceptable to someone who disagrees with your own argument. Then, provide the best response you can to the objection, showing how it does not undermine your position. Your response should not simply restate your original position or argument

but should say something new in support of it.

• Conclusion

Provide a conclusion that sums up what you presented in the paper and offers some final reflections.

MODEL ANSWER

Morals of War

Question

Should the military actions be regulated in circumstances where a country’s military force is used against a country or group?

Introduction

Should the military be regulated in circumstances under which they can use military force against a country or group? This has been one of the critical questions asked in the modern military. The point of discussion has been whether the military should be observed as a mercenary army or as a | PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW AT writtask.com | society has demanded military be categorized as a profession and as such the military should be guided by profession moral standards as they provide protection of national security. In many instances, the military is engaged in external security affairs where it protects the country from external security threats. In such engagement, activities of the military are controlled by different codes of ethics. Frederickson and Rohr (2015) noted that a country has to be cautious when engaging military operations against a group or country when launching | PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW AT writtask.com | consultations must be advocated for (Frederickson & Rohr, 2015). This ensures that activities of the military do not…

Thesis Statement In the modern society, where respect for foreign countries’ sovereignty and human rights is very important, military activities should be | PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW AT writtask.com | reason for advocating military activities control is that most of the military missions provide the justification and objectives, which the military pursues and thus acting as yardsticks against which the military | PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW AT writtask.com | forces are engaged in a mission where the political and military objectives are clearly stated. The objectives…