HOMEWORK GUIDE | Choose either the same ethical question you formulated and introduced in the Week One Assignment

Please also use the instructions on the separate download. Please use the instructions on  F_Dunn_assignment_3 and delete what is written and write the essay. Also use the F_Dunn_assignment_1 to improve the essay.

The following short essay assignment is designed to help prepare you for an important part of the Final Paper. In this essay, you will do the following:


Tell us about your assignment and we will find the best writer for your project.

Write My Essay For Me
  • Choose either the same ethical question you formulated and introduced in the Week One Assignment
  • Choose either utilitarian or deontological ethical theory to apply to the ethical question.
  • Explain the core principles of that theory.
  • Demonstrate how the principles of the theory support a certain position on that question.
  • Articulate a relevant objection to that position.

Write a five-paragraph essay that conforms to the requirements below. The paper must be at least 1,000 words in length (excluding title and reference pages) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.The paragraphs of your essay should conform to the following guidelines:

  • Introduction
    The introduction should clearly state the ethical question under consideration and define the essential issues. You may build upon the question and introduction you provided in the Week One Assignment; or you may choose a different question, but it must be based off the list of acceptable topics. Your introduction should include a brief remark about the kind of theory you will be using to approach this question. The last sentence of the introduction should briefly summarize the or position on the issue you think is best supported by this theory and succinctly state what the objection will be. Bear in mind that your essay will not be concerned with your own position on this issue, but what someone reasoning along the lines of the chosen theory would conclude; this may or may not be the position you took in the Week One Assignment.
  • Body Paragraphs
    Each paragraph in the body should start with a topic sentence that clearly identifies the main idea of the paragraph.
  • Theory explanation
    Explain the core principles or features of the deontological or utilitarian theory and the general account of moral reasoning it provides.

You must quote from at least one required resource other than your textbook that defends or represents that theory. Refer to the list of acceptable resources.

| PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW AT writtask.com |

  • Application
    Demonstrate how the principles or features of the deontological or utilitarian theory apply to the question under consideration and identify the specific conclusion that results from applying the reasoning characteristic of that kind of approach.

Your application should clearly show how the conclusion follows from the main principles and features of the theory as addressed in the previous paragraph. Please see the associated guidance for help in fulfilling this requirement.

| PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW AT writtask.com |

  • Objection
    Raise a relevant objection to the argument expressed in your application. An objection articulates a plausible reason why someone might find the argument problematic. This can be a false or unsupported claim or assumption, fallacious reasoning, a deep concern about what the conclusion involves, a demonstration of how the argument supports other conclusions that are unacceptable, etc. You should aim to explain this objection as objectively as possible, (i.e., in a way that would be acceptable to someone who disagrees with the argument from the previous paragraph).

Note that this does not necessarily mean that the objection succeeds, or that the conclusion the theory supports is wrong. It may be an obstacle that any adequate defense of the conclusion would have to overcome, and it may be the case that the theory has the resources to overcome that obstacle. Your task here is simply to raise the objection or present the “obstacle.”

  • Conclusion
    The conclusion should very briefly summarize the main points of your essay.

Resource Requirements

| PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW AT writtask.com |

  • You must use at least two resources to support your claims.
  • At least one of the resources should be one of the Required or Recommended Resources that represent the theory you have chosen and must be drawn from the list of acceptable resources available in your online classroom.
  • The other source should pertain to the particular issue you are writing about and should be drawn from the required or recommended readings in the course, or be a scholarly source found in the Ashford University Library. https://library.ashford.edu/index.aspx 
  • You will need this to get into the Ashford Library
  • https://login.ashford.edu/?_ga=2.51481833.1165182594.1522280919-1298482295.1518371737
  • student id: FRDUNN6665  password: Jaicen1996
  • You are encouraged to use additional resources, so long as at least two conform to the requirements above.
  • The textbook does not count toward satisfying the resources requirement.
  • To count toward satisfying the requirement, resources must be cited within the body of your paper and on the reference page and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.


How appropriate is it when junior military soldiers disobey the unjust and illegal orders given to them by higher ranking officials? This question continues to puzzle both the civilian and people working in the military profession yet as all of us know, the junior soldiers have a duty to obey all orders given to them by their seniors whether illegal or unjust. The argument given is that the orders given supersedes the powers of whoever gives them and hence the junior offices are bound to them without thinking. Even though such orders can be perceived by junior officers as unethical, they have no option to follow them or risk losing their jobs. Using deontology theory, this essay will approach this question that more often than not lingers in the minds of many. The theory basically postulates that everyone has a moral duty to act as per rules and principles set up no matter the consequences that come with such actions. This theory will therefore seek to provide vital concepts that can be used to address the posed question with view of understanding the appropriate decisions to be pursued by the military officers(especially in the junior rank) in | PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW AT writtask.com | can be argued that the junior soldiers have a moral and ethical duty not to obey the illegal and unjust orders imposed on them by their superiors no matter the expected o | PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW AT writtask.com | opposition to the argument explains how inappropriate this is because it will affect not only the …


Order Original and Plagiarism-free Papers Written from Scratch: