Essay Help | Explain how the conclusion of the counterargument follows from its premises.

Counterargument Paper

This paper assignment expands upon your Week One Assignment and prepares you for the Final Paper. The expansion is to learn to improve one’s argument after investigating and fairly representing the opposite point of view. The main new tasks are to revise your previous argument created in Week One, to present a counterargument (an argument for a contrary conclusion), and to develop an objection to your original argument.

| PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW AT writtask.com |

Here are the steps to prepare to write the counterargument paper:

Begin reviewing your previous paper paying particular attention to suggestions for improvement made by your instructor.

Revise your argument, improving it as much as possible, accounting for any suggestions and in light of further material you have learned in the course. If your argument is inductive, make sure that it is strong. If your argument is deductive, make sure that it is valid.

Construct what you take to be the strongest possible argument for a conclusion contrary to the one you argued for in your Week One paper. This is your counterargument. This should be based on careful thought and appropriate research.

Consider the primary points of disagreement between the point of view of your original argument and that of the counterargument.

| PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW AT writtask.com |

Think about what you take to be the strongest objection to your original argument and how you might answer the objection while being fair to both sides. Search in the Ashford University Library for quality academic sources that support some aspect of your argument or counterargument.

In your paper,

• Present a revised argument in standard form, with each premise and the conclusion on a separate line.
• Present a counterargument in standard form, with each premise and the conclusion on a separate line.
• Provide support for each premise of your counterargument. Clarify the meaning of the premise and supporting evidence for the premise.
• Pay special attention to those premises that could be seen as controversial. Evidence may include academic research sources, supporting arguments, or other ways of demonstrating the truth of the premise (for more ideas about how to support the truth of premises take a look at the instructor guidance for this week). This section should include at least one scholarly research source. For guidance about how to develop a conclusion see the Ashford Writing Center’s Introductions and Conclusions (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..

Explain how the conclusion of the counterargument follows from its premises. [One paragraph]

Discuss the primary points of disagreement between sincere and intelligent proponents of both sides. [One to two paragraphs]

| PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW AT writtask.com |

For example, you might list any premises or background assumptions on which you think such proponents would disagree and briefly state what you see as the source of the disagreement, you could give a brief explanation of any reasoning that you think each side would find objectionable, or you could do a combination of these.

Present the best objection to your original argument. Clearly indicate what part of the argument your objection is aimed at, and provide a paragraph of supporting evidence for the objection. Reference at least one scholarly research source. [One to two paragraphs]

Must include a separate title page with the following:

• Title of paper
• Student’s name
• Course name and number
• Instructor’s name
• Date submitted

MODEL ANSWER

Universal Healthcare

Revised argument

Premises

Premise 1: Universal healthcare is important for a productive society as it is with education.

Premise 2: Healthcare is protected by the constitution as right entitled to all the citizens

Premise 3: The constitution guarantees inclusivity and equal rights in healthcare access to all citizens, whether they can afford to pay or not.

Conclusion: Universal health should, therefore, be availed to all the citizens for free.

Rationale

The first premise equates education to healthcare and defines them as two interlinking objectives that are mandated to the government. The two are necessary for growth of the economy since they help to maximize the productivity and efficiency of an individual. Hence, healthcare should be availed to all, universally and unconditionally.

The second premise address the issue of healthcare as a constitutional right. It is the responsibility of the government to protect all the rights of the Citizens, and Universal Healthcare should be part of the priority. Universal Healthcare helps to reduce the costs of health insurance and more so it keeps the people active and productive. The third premise reinstates the second premise. It is the responsibility of the government to ensure that all people have access to basic needs. Therefore, both the federal and state governments should promote the wellbeing of citizens by ensuring inclusive coverage of the medical services. That ensures all citizens will continue to enjoy their rights without deprivation. It doesn’t limit the people who are poor, healthcare should be distributed to all without…