ASSIGNMENT HELP | Suppose a condemned prisoner is placed in the electric chair and the switch is thrown, but the chair malfunctions.

Suppose a condemned prisoner is placed in the electric chair and the switch is thrown, but the chair malfunctions. After the electric chair is repaired, may the prisoner be required to endure a second \”execution\”? Consider this question in light of a general sense of justice; due process; or the Eighth Amendment\’s prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment.

PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW AT writtask.com |

See Louisiana ex rel. Francis v. Resweber, 329 U.S. 459, 67 S.Ct. 374 (1947).

Minimum Requirements:

1-2 pages in length

Provide a 500-word minimum essay.

Use property APA formatting and citations, including ‘in-text’ citations.

Reference at least 2 outside credible resources.

SAMPLE SOLUTION

After the electric chair is repaired, the prisoner should not be subjected to another attempt to execution because it is a violation of the eighth PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW AT writtask.com | rights of any American citizen do not end once one has been found guilty and convicted but instead they extend to the punishment phase. This question presents a critical case where the eighth amendment is called into PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW AT writtask.com | on Louisiana ex rel. Francis v. Resweber, 329 U.S. 459, 67 S.Ct. 374 (1947) and the impact that it had on the Eighth Amendment rights.

By trying to electrocute the Louisiana convict for a second time, the court would have violated the conventional humanity rules and regulations highlighted in the Anglo-American laws which banned the intentional infliction of pain by electrocuting of the PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW AT writtask.com | to put the convict on the electric chair for a second time means that the court and the criminal justice system would have acted in violation of the Eighth PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW AT writtask.com | that the convict would have been subjected to that form of punishment would have resulted in intentionally inflicting pain on the convict.

The Eighth Amendment as provided within the Constitution prevents the use of any type of punishment that the Justice system deems to be cruel or unusual in its PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW AT writtask.com | provided within the eighth amendment does PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW AT writtask.com | explain the phrase any further than it has.  When a state decides to put a convict to death, they have wide discretion on choosing what PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW AT writtask.com | they can use to PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW AT writtask.com |has for a long time been trying to PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW AT writtask.com | on the choices that states have PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW AT writtask.com | being made around the eighth amendment provide a thorny patch for legal leaders who believe that the amendment does not solve the entire question at hand but PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW AT writtask.com | needs to be coupled with PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW AT writtask.com | attempt at execution of the convict could be seen as an attempt to PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW AT writtask.com | justice and not a violation of the eighth PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW AT writtask.com | of a mishap occurs like illustrated in the case mentioned above, that case could be viewed as one that does not present a violation of the PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW AT writtask.com | there is no form of cruelty highlighted within the method or procedure being used or any form of harm whatsoever. By electrocuting the convict, one could argue that…