ASSIGNMENT HELP | If you were a defense attorney and knew that the person you were defending was guilty of a crime would you still represent them?

If you were a defense attorney and knew that the person you were defending was guilty of a crime would you still represent them? Would you tell the court that they were guilty? Would the crime they committed matter?

PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW AT writtask.com |

MODEL ANSWER

If I were a defense attorney, and I know that my client is guilty of a crime, I would still represent them. The reason is that it is not the attorney’s responsibility to decide whether or not the defendant committed a crime. There is a significant difference between legal guilt and factual PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW AT writtask.com | is what the prosecution can prove beyond a reasonable doubt, whereas factual guilt is what the client did. It does not matter what the defendant did or did not do; what matters is whether the state can prove that they did it. The defendant is not legally guilty until the prosecution provides sufficient evidence beyond a reasonable doubt to prove otherwise.

However, an attorney of the court may not provide PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW AT writtask.com | information or lie to a jury or judge by stating explicitly that the defendant did not PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW AT writtask.com | the alleged crime, while they know that the PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW AT writtask.com |cannot go against his client’s wishes and admit PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW AT writtask.com | competent attorney must focus their trial arguments and tactics on the inability of the government to prove their client’s guilt. In conclusion, defense lawyers have a PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW AT writtask.com | responsibility to represent a client with PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW AT writtask.com | of guilt to their lawyer does not necessarily mean that they committed the crime. They could be doing so to protect someone else or maybe guilty of a PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW AT writtask.com | crime than the one they are being prosecuted. A defense lawyer should focus on the facts of the case and leave the burden of guilt to the judge or jury.