Are some company’s products too dangerous to be marketed under any circumstances? What regulations, if any, would you place on marketing cigarettes? Handguns? Drugs?
| PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW AT writtask.com |
WE WRITE PAPERS FOR STUDENTS
Tell us about your assignment and we will find the best writer for your project.
Write My Essay For MeYes, there are some products whose marketability proves to be dangerous, especially under specific | PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW AT writtask.com | weapons of mass destruction that companies build for governments under strict contractual agreements when terrorism activities are on the rampant can be regarded as being insensitive by the security apparatus. Another example is marketing caffeinated energy drinks such as 5-hour energy and Red Bull or junk food products targeting a student population is dangerous, especially when the country is trying to fight obesity and other lifestyle-related | PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW AT writtask.com | marketing campaigns and products should be avoided at all costs as they contravene marketing regulations and the products are often unhealthy.
| PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW AT writtask.com |
There are already notable regulations for marketing | PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW AT writtask.com | products should not be marketed in any form of media. Research shows that tobacco, drugs, and handgun advertising can easily influence young people to use | PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW AT writtask.com | , banning such advertisements can help reduce the exposure and hence harmful effects of these products.
| PLACE YOUR ORDER NOW AT writtask.com |
Response peer 1
Peer 1 has fully responded to the question by arguing that there is no need for further regulations since there are notable restrictions already enforced on cigarettes. Additionally, cigarette and handgun companies’ political influence has made it even harder to institute any restrictions. The peer rightly argues that political parties already engage in legal bribery, and it will be hard to enforce any restrictions to the companies even without focusing on marketing.
Response peer 2
The peer logically outlines the legal journey that has faced the marketing of Cigarettes. For instance, the continued ban on advertising has reduced smoking from 21% in 2015 to 13% in 2018 as per the CDC’s statistics. Consequently, the peer rightly argues that although stopping ads and instituting education programs hasn’t stopped using the said products or their substitutes, its benefits are already visible. The work is, therefore, well written with personal experience and reference being outlined.
References
Ramamurthi, D., Gall, P. A., Ayoub, N., & Jackler, R. K. (2016). Leading-brand advertisement for quitting smoking benefits for e-cigarettes. American Journal of Public Health, 106(11), 2057-2063. https://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/abs/10.2105/AJPH.2016.303437
Order Original and Plagiarism-free Papers Written from Scratch:
